如果是,那么保证是每台机器还是在哪台机器上生成UUID无关紧要?由于V1 UUID是时间戳MAC地址,因此Postgres内部按时间戳部分排序,然后按MAC排序吗?
我可以“订购”UUID类型列并期望它始终有效(似乎工作)?
我想在多台机器上生成UUID(使用postgresql uuid_generate_v1()),将它们复制到一个Postgres实例,然后按UUID列排序.它必须保证按机器排序,而不是所有机器的UUID顺序.
解决方法
生成这样的映射应该允许人们在Postgresql中查看特定的UUID结构(明确定义的类型之一或其他)“以特定方式命令”.
With UIDs As (-- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F Select ID = 'F',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000011' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = 'E',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000001100' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = 'D',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000110000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = 'C',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-000011000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = 'B',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-001100000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = 'A',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-110000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '9',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-0011-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '8',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0000-1100-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '7',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-0011-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '6',UID = cast ('00000000-0000-1100-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '5',UID = cast ('00000000-0011-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '4',UID = cast ('00000000-1100-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '3',UID = cast ('00000011-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '2',UID = cast ('00001100-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '1',UID = cast ('00110000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) Union Select ID = '0',UID = cast ('11000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' as uniqueidentifier) ) Select * From UIDs Order By UID desc
在sql Server(2014,and matches that in SQL Server 2005)中,降序排序为:
Position by highest-to-lowest value: A B C D E F | 8 9 | 7 6 | 5 4 | 3 2 1 0
由于sql Server的newsequentialid利用这种顺序进行索引友好的GUID生成,因此行为可能永远不会改变. sql Server还必须在所有系统中维护此行为以支持复制.因此,如果问题是关于sql Server,我肯定会说“sql Server中存在一致的GUID排序”,这绝对可以依赖于sql Server.
但是,这种排序与.NET的GUID排序不同,如果Postgresql中的排序不同,我也不会感到惊讶. sql Server中的“翻转”差异是因为它遵循COM GUIDs的“变体2”(又名小端)排序;甚至对于“变体1”UUID也是如此. (然而,为什么这些组织本身从右到左排序似乎更加随意:更多的微软历史?)
有趣的问题仍然存在:在Postgresql中指定哪个/如何指定?如果它没有明确指定,那么实现是否仍然可以被视为行为公理?
也是see this question for more details about SQL Server’s UUIDs;为什么这些差异存在的美味细节.