我在Apollo graphql中具有Post Comment模型的实现，哪种模式是我想知道哪种实现是正确的？

  type Post {
    id: ID!
    title: String
    image: File
    imagePublicId: String
    comments: [Comment] # we have type for Comment in another schema file
    createdAt: String
    updatedAt: String
  }

  extend type Query {
    # Gets post by id
    getPosts(authUserId: ID!,skip: Int,limit: Int): Post
  }

我有一个解析器，它通过猫鼬的填充函数（如下所示）来解析Post类型并解析评论：

const Query = {
getPosts: async (root,{ authUserId,skip,limit },{ Post }) => {

    const allPosts = await Post.find(query)
      .populate({
        path: 'comments',options: { sort: { createdAt: 'desc' } },populate: { path: 'author' },})
      .skip(skip)
      .limit(limit)
      .sort({ createdAt: 'desc' });

    return allPosts
  }
}

在解析器中实现getPosts查询的第二种方式的可能方法是不使用猫鼬的填充函数，而通过为其编写单独的函数来手动解析它：

const Query = {
getPosts: async (root,{ Post }) => {
    const allPosts = await Post.find(query)
      .skip(skip)
      .limit(limit)
      .sort({ createdAt: 'desc' });

    return allPosts
  }
  Post: {
   comments: (root,args,ctx,info) => {
    return Comment.find({post: root._id}).exec()
   }
  }
}